![]() The University of Texas case on race-conscious admission, also led by Edward Blum. "This outcome would be a radical act by the court, which is supposed to respect its own precedents, especially precedents like this one that were recently affirmed," said Turnage Young, citing the 2016 Fisher v. But, if the court rules in favor of SFFA, it would overturn 44 years of precedent that affirmed the educational value of diversity. If the Supreme Court rules in Harvard and UNC's favor, then it would uphold current law and affirm lower court rulings, Turnage Young said. The ruling could come any time before June 2023. "But there are a wide range of potential outcomes that are less favorable." "The best-case scenario here would be for the court to affirm its longstanding precedent and uphold both Harvard and UNC's minimal consideration of race as just one of dozens of factors that the schools consider in admissions," said Michaele Turnage Young, senior counsel at the Legal Defense Fund. will be able to use race as a consideration in their admissions processes. ![]() ![]() The ruling will decide whether private and public postsecondary institutions in the U.S. The cases, led by anti-affirmative action activist and SFFA President Edward Blum, allege these institutions discriminated against Asian American applicants by unfairly prioritizing underrepresented minority applicants in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. University of North Carolina (UNC) Chapel Hill cases argued Oct. Supreme Court in the Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Higher education is expecting a ruling from the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |